Two‐stage majoritarian choice

نویسندگان

چکیده

We propose a class of decisive collective choice rules that rely on linear ordering to partition the majority relation into two acyclic relations. The first these relations is used pare down set feasible alternatives shortlist while second make final from shortlist. Rules in this are characterized by four properties: classical rationality requirements (Sen's Expansion Consistency and Manzini Mariotti's Weak WARP ); adaptations (Arrow's Independence Irrelevant Alternatives Saari Barney's No Preference Reversal Bias ). These also satisfy some other desirable properties, including an adaptation May's Positive Responsiveness .

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Majoritarian Group Actions

In this paper, we introduce a logic to reason about group actions for groups that are defined by means of the majority rule. It is well known that majoritarian aggregation is subject to irrationality, as the results in social choice theory and judgment aggregation show. The logic of action that we use here for modelling group actions is based on a substructural propositional logic that allows f...

متن کامل

A Majoritarian Representative Voting System

We present an alternative voting system that aims at bridging the gap between proportional representative systems and majoritarian, single winner election systems. The system lets people vote for multiple parties, but then assigns each ballot to a single party. This opens a whole range of possible systems, all representative. We show theoretically that this space is convex. Then among the possi...

متن کامل

The geometry of consistent majoritarian judgement aggregation

Given a set of propositions with unknown truth values, a ‘judgement aggregation rule’ is a way to aggregate the personal truth-valuations of a set of jurors into some ‘collective’ truth valuation. We introduce the class of ‘quasimajoritarian’ judgement aggregation rules, which includes majority vote, but also includes some rules which use different weighted voting schemes to decide the truth of...

متن کامل

On Majoritarian Bargaining with Incomplete Information

December 2008 [Abstract] This paper studies a finite horizon version of Baron and Ferejohn’s (1989) majoritarian bargaining with incomplete information. Our devised model essentially blends Spence’s signaling and the coalition formation of majoritarian bargaining. The main findings include: (i) oversized coalitions may arise in equilibrium and allowing for delay can be optimal for a proposer; (...

متن کامل

Subgame Perfect Equilibria in Majoritarian Bargaining

We study three-person bargaining games with discounting, where an alternative is accepted if it is approved by a majority of players. We characterize the set of subgame perfect equilibrium payoffs and show that for any proposal in the space of possible agreements there exists a discount factor such that given the proposal is made and accepted by one of the players in period zero. Also we constr...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Theoretical Economics

سال: 2022

ISSN: ['1555-7561', '1933-6837']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3982/te4712